SentinelXR UniCompass
Most institutions hand a learner between four systems before they even enrol. Every handover loses context, and the context is what would have told you they were about to leave.
The learner who drops out in year two was usually visible in week three.
Not from grades — those come too late. From the pattern: the questions they asked at the open day, the module they switched, the term they stopped opening anything. That evidence exists today, scattered across a CRM, an admissions portal, an LMS and a spreadsheet nobody owns.
The thread
01
Prospect
Open days, enquiries and the questions they actually asked — kept, not discarded once they apply.
02
Applicant
Application, documents, interviews and offers, with one status the applicant can actually see.
03
Enrolled
Onboarding, placement and module choice — informed by what they told you before they arrived.
04
Learning
Campus, Class or Reach does the teaching. Understanding flows back into the same record.
05
Alumnus
Transcripts, credentials and continuing study, without the record being archived to nowhere.
What it changes
Marketing sees outcomes
Not just applications. Which channel produced learners who stayed, finished and came back — the only number that justifies next year's budget.
Retention gets early warning
Concept-level understanding plus engagement, weeks before a grade would show it. Early enough that a conversation still helps.
The learner stops repeating themselves
One login, one identity, one thread. No re-entering the same details for the fourth department to ask again.
On the learner's phone
Most admissions apps are deleted the week term starts. UniCompass becomes the thing they check for deadlines, timetables and where they stand — so the channel you used to recruit them is the channel you still have in year three.
A single programme's next intake is enough to show whether the thread holds. That is one term, not a transformation programme.